HD Graphics 400 vs GeForce GT 130M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated1080
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameN10P-GE1Braswell GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date8 January 2009 (15 years ago)1 April 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3296
CUDA cores32no data
Core clock speed600 MHz320 MHz
Boost clock speedno data640 MHz
Number of transistors314 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt6 Watt
Texture fill rate9.6007.680
Floating-point performance0.096 gflops0.1229 gflops
Gigaflops144no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP
SLI options2-way-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2, GDDR3DDR3L
Maximum RAM amountUp to 1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed500 (DDR2)/800 (GDDR3) MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth16 (DDR2)/25 (GDDR3)no data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsSingle Link DVIDisplayPortVGAHDMIDual Link DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL2.14.3
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.1.80
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2009 1 April 2015
Chip lithography 55 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 6 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 283.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 130M and HD Graphics 400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 130M is a notebook card while HD Graphics 400 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M
GeForce GT 130M
Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 22 votes

Rate GeForce GT 130M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 390 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.