GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM vs G102M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1247not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.11no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameC79GK106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date8 January 2009 (15 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16960
Core clock speed450 MHz1033 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1098 MHz
Number of transistors314 million2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate3.60087.84
Floating-point processing power0.0352 TFLOPSno data
Gigaflops48no data
ROPs424
TMUs880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 1.0no data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountUp to 512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s192.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsVGAHDMIDisplayPortSingle Link DVILVDSNo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.06.5 (5.1)
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2.175
CUDA+3.0

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 150 Watt

GeForce G102M has 971.4% lower power consumption.

GTX 750 Ti OEM, on the other hand, has a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce G102M and GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce G102M is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce G102M
GeForce G102M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 40 votes

Rate GeForce G102M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 109 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.