Radeon Pro 580 vs GeForce FX Go5200 64M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated271
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data9.28
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameNV34 B1Polaris 20
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 March 2003 (21 year ago)5 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2304
Core clock speed250 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors45 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rate1.000172.8
Floating-point processing powerno data5.53 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs4144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz1695 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s217.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2003 5 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm

Pro 580 has an age advantage of 14 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX Go5200 64M and Radeon Pro 580. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX Go5200 64M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 580 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5200 64M
GeForce FX Go5200 64M
AMD Radeon Pro 580
Radeon Pro 580

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate GeForce FX Go5200 64M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 70 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.