Radeon R7 250 OEM vs GeForce FX Go 5200

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1489not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameNV31MOland
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 March 2003 (21 year ago)8 October 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5384
Core clock speed1 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHz1050 MHz
Number of transistorsno data950 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data65 Watt
Texture fill rateno data25.20
Floating-point processing powerno data0.8064 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR3
Maximum RAM amount32 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data32 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDDR12 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2003 8 October 2013
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm

R7 250 OEM has an age advantage of 10 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX Go 5200 and Radeon R7 250 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX Go 5200 is a notebook card while Radeon R7 250 OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5200
GeForce FX Go 5200
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM
Radeon R7 250 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 17 votes

Rate GeForce FX Go 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 51 vote

Rate Radeon R7 250 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.