Riva 128 vs GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1429not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.15no data
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)no data
GPU code nameNV38NV3
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 October 2003 (21 year ago)1 April 1997 (27 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed475 MHz100 MHz
Number of transistors135 million4 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)74 Watt4 Watt
Texture fill rate3.8000.1
ROPs41
TMUs81

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xAGP 2x
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed475 MHz100 MHz
Memory bandwidth30.4 GB/s1.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x VGA, 1x DB13W3

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a5.0
OpenGL2.11.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2003 1 April 1997
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 350 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 74 Watt 4 Watt

FX 5950 Ultra has an age advantage of 6 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 169.2% more advanced lithography process.

Riva 128, on the other hand, has 1750% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5950 Ultra and Riva 128. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
NVIDIA Riva 128
Riva 128

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 77 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5950 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 44 votes

Rate Riva 128 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce FX 5950 Ultra or Riva 128, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.