GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs FX 5900

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1463not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameNV35GT218
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 May 2003 (21 year ago)12 July 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed400 MHz520 MHz
Number of transistors135 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data25 Watt
Texture fill rate3.2004.160
Floating-point processing powerno data0.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 2.0 x16
Length218 mm170 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR2
Maximum RAM amount128 MB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed425 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth27.2 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a11.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)3.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 May 2003 12 July 2010
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 40 nm

8400 GS Rev. 3 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 225% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5900 and GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900
GeForce FX 5900
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 43 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 131 vote

Rate GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.