B200 SXM 192 GB vs GeForce FX 5900 Ultra

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1444not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.13no data
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Blackwell (2024)
GPU code nameNV35GB100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date23 October 2003 (21 year ago)2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16896
Core clock speed450 MHz1665 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1837 MHz
Number of transistors135 million208,000 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)59 Watt1000 Watt
Texture fill rate3.600969.9
Floating-point processing powerno data62.08 TFLOPS
ROPs424
TMUs8528
Tensor Coresno data528

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 5.0 x16
Length218 mmno data
Width2-slotSXM Module
Supplementary power connectors1x Molexno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM3e
Maximum RAM amount256 MB96 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed425 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth27.2 GB/s4.1 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0aN/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)N/A
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-9.0

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 96 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 59 Watt 1000 Watt

FX 5900 Ultra has 1594.9% lower power consumption.

B200 SXM 192 GB, on the other hand, has a 38300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5900 Ultra and B200 SXM 192 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX 5900 Ultra is a desktop card while B200 SXM 192 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 Ultra
GeForce FX 5900 Ultra
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB
B200 SXM 192 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 6 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5900 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 31 vote

Rate B200 SXM 192 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.