UHD Graphics 605 vs GeForce FX 5800

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1079
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data16.22
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameNV30Gemini Lake GT1.5
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 March 2003 (21 year ago)11 December 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data144
Core clock speed400 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data750 MHz
Number of transistors125 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)44 Watt5 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20013.50
Floating-point processing powerno data0.216 TFLOPS
ROPs43
TMUs818

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xRing Bus
Length213 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x Molexno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 March 2003 11 December 2017
Chip lithography 130 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 44 Watt 5 Watt

UHD Graphics 605 has an age advantage of 14 years, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 780% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5800 and UHD Graphics 605. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX 5800 is a desktop card while UHD Graphics 605 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX 5800
GeForce FX 5800
Intel UHD Graphics 605
UHD Graphics 605

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 22 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 835 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 605 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce FX 5800 or UHD Graphics 605, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.