Quadro P500 vs GeForce FX 5800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated680
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameNV30GP108
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date6 March 2003 (21 year ago)14 November 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data256
Core clock speed400 MHz1455 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1519 MHz
Number of transistors125 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)44 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20021.25
Floating-point performanceno data0.7772 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Length213 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s32.1 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video3x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12.1
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.0.1
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 March 2003 14 November 2017
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 44 Watt 18 Watt

Quadro P500 has an age advantage of 14 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 144.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5800 and Quadro P500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX 5800 is a desktop card while Quadro P500 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX 5800
GeForce FX 5800
NVIDIA Quadro P500
Quadro P500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 22 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 26 votes

Rate Quadro P500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.