Radeon HD 6670A vs GeForce FX 5700

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameNV36Turks
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date23 October 2003 (21 year ago)19 April 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data480
Core clock speed425 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors82 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate1.70014.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.576 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xMXM-A (3.0)
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a11.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.4
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2003 19 April 2011
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 45 Watt

FX 5700 has 80% lower power consumption.

HD 6670A, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 225% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5700 and Radeon HD 6670A. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX 5700 is a desktop card while Radeon HD 6670A is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700
GeForce FX 5700
AMD Radeon HD 6670A
Radeon HD 6670A

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 70 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6670A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.