Radeon Graphics 448SP vs GeForce FX 5700 Ultra

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1462not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.14no data
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNV36Renoir
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 October 2003 (21 year ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data448
Core clock speed475 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1900 MHz
Number of transistors82 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)46 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate1.90053.20
Floating-point processing powerno data1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs428

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xIGP
Length229 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x MolexNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed453 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth14.5 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoMotherboard Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7 (6.4)
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2003 6 January 2020
Chip lithography 130 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 46 Watt 15 Watt

Graphics 448SP has an age advantage of 16 years, a 1757.1% more advanced lithography process, and 206.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5700 Ultra and Radeon Graphics 448SP. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
AMD Radeon Graphics 448SP
Radeon Graphics 448SP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 5 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5700 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 66 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 448SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.