Tesla S1070 vs GeForce FX 5600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameNV31GT200B
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 March 2003 (21 year ago)1 June 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data240
Core clock speed325 MHz610 MHz
Number of transistors80 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt800 Watt
Texture fill rate1.30048.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs480

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 2.0 x16
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s102.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a11.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)3.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 March 2003 1 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 800 Watt

FX 5600 has 2062.2% lower power consumption.

Tesla S1070, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 136.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5600 and Tesla S1070. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX 5600 is a desktop card while Tesla S1070 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX 5600
GeForce FX 5600
NVIDIA Tesla S1070
Tesla S1070

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 65 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 4 votes

Rate Tesla S1070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.