GeForce 9800 GTX vs 9800M GTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9800M GTX with GeForce 9800 GTX, including specs and performance data.

9800M GTX
2008
1 GB GDDR3, 75 Watt
1.18

9800 GTX outperforms 9800M GTX by an impressive 69% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1069898
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.060.10
Power efficiency1.080.98
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG92G92
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 July 2008 (16 years ago)28 March 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$328.50 $299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

9800 GTX has 67% better value for money than 9800M GTX.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores112128
CUDA cores per GPU112no data
Core clock speed500 MHz675 MHz
Number of transistors754 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt140 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate28.0043.20
Floating-point processing power0.28 TFLOPS0.4321 TFLOPS
Gigaflops420no data
ROPs1616
TMUs5664

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin
SLI options++

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1100 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s70.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsHDTVDual Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-Via Adapter
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataS/PDIF

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9800M GTX 1.18
9800 GTX 2.00
+69.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9800M GTX 454
9800 GTX 769
+69.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Elden Ring 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Dota 2 0−1 0−1
Elden Ring 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Fortnite 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
World of Tanks 24−27
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Dota 2 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−11
−60%
16−18
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
World of Tanks 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Valorant 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−66.7%
5−6
+66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
−68.8%
27−30
+68.8%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Valorant 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.18 2.00
Recency 15 July 2008 28 March 2008
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 140 Watt

9800M GTX has an age advantage of 3 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 86.7% lower power consumption.

9800 GTX, on the other hand, has a 69.5% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce 9800 GTX is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GTX in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GTX is a notebook card while GeForce 9800 GTX is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX
GeForce 9800M GTX
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX
GeForce 9800 GTX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 188 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.