UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs vs GeForce 9800M GTS

Place in performance ranking	1119	668
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	G9x (2007−2010)	Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code name	NB9E-GT	Tiger Lake Xe
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 July 2008 (16 years ago)	30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	64	32
CUDA cores	64	no data
Core clock speed	600 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1450 MHz
Number of transistors	505 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	19.20	no data
Floating-point performance	0.192 gflops	no data
Gigaflops	240	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	no data
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	no data
Memory bus width	256 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	51.2 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	DirectX 12_1
Shader Model	4.0	no data
OpenGL	3.3	no data
OpenCL	1.1	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-
CUDA	+	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

3−4

−433%

16
+433%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4
−300%

12−14

+300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1300%	14 +1300%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −500%	12−14 +500%
Hitman 3	5−6 −220%	16 +220%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −123%	27−30 +123%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −1200%	13 +1200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −129%	16−18 +129%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −37.5%	40−45 +37.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1200%	13 +1200%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −500%	12−14 +500%
Hitman 3	5−6 −140%	12 +140%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −123%	27−30 +123%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −300%	4 +300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −129%	16−18 +129%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −70%	16−18 +70%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −37.5%	40−45 +37.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −300%	16−18 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −300%	12−14 +300%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1100%	12 +1100%
Hitman 3	5−6 −320%	21−24 +320%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −323%	55−60 +323%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −329%	30−33 +329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −70%	16−18 +70%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −37.5%	40−45 +37.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1−2

−300%

4−5
+300%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Hitman 3	7−8 −329%	30−33 +329%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −300%	16−18 +300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −575%	27−30 +575%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4
−300%

12−14

+300%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	2−3
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	0−1	2−3

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−300%

8−9
+300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	11 +0%	11 +0%
Battlefield 5	18 +0%	18 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9 +0%	9 +0%
Battlefield 5	16 +0%	16 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Metro Exodus	6 +0%	6 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Battlefield 5	15 +0%	15 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Hitman 3	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Hitman 3	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

This is how 9800M GTS and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is 433% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is 1300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is ahead in 27 tests (49%)
there's a draw in 28 tests (51%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.97	4.36
Recency	15 July 2008	30 March 2021
Chip lithography	65 nm	14 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs has a 349.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GTS in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.