ATI Radeon X1600 XT vs GeForce 9800M GTS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9800M GTS with Radeon X1600 XT, including specs and performance data.

9800M GTS
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 75 Watt
0.98
+227%

9800M GTS outperforms ATI X1600 XT by a whopping 227% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11141329
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.900.49
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameG94RV530
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date29 July 2008 (16 years ago)1 October 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64no data
Core clock speed600 MHz590 MHz
Number of transistors505 million157 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt42 Watt
Texture fill rate19.202.360
Floating-point processing power0.192 TFLOPSno data
Gigaflops240no data
ROPs164
TMUs324

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz690 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s22.08 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.03.0
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9800M GTS 0.98
+227%
ATI X1600 XT 0.30

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9800M GTS 376
+227%
ATI X1600 XT 115

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3 0−1
Hitman 3 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+256%
9−10
−256%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3 0−1
Hitman 3 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+256%
9−10
−256%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Hitman 3 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
+256%
9−10
−256%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Hitman 3 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4 0−1

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.98 0.30
Recency 29 July 2008 1 October 2007
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 42 Watt

9800M GTS has a 226.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1600 XT, on the other hand, has 78.6% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 9800M GTS is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1600 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GTS is a notebook card while Radeon X1600 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS
GeForce 9800M GTS
ATI Radeon X1600 XT
Radeon X1600 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 42 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GTS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 42 votes

Rate Radeon X1600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.