ATI Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP vs GeForce 9800M GTS SLI

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking894not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.90no data
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameNB9E-GTRS780
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 July 2008 (16 years ago)4 March 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12840
Core clock speed600 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million180 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data2.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.04 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1010.0 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.0
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 July 2008 4 March 2008
Chip lithography 55 nm 65 nm

9800M GTS SLI has an age advantage of 4 months, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800M GTS SLI and Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GTS SLI is a notebook card while Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTS SLI
GeForce 9800M GTS SLI
ATI Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP
Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 8 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GTS SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Radeon Xpress 2100 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.