Radeon RX Vega 7 vs GeForce 9800M GT SLI
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 9800M GT SLI and Radeon RX Vega 7, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RX Vega 7 outperforms 9800M GT SLI by a whopping 274% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 896 | 529 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 12 |
| Architecture | G9x (2007−2010) | Vega (2017−2020) |
| GPU code name | NB9E-GT2 | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 July 2008 (16 years ago) | 7 January 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 192 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1800 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1508 Million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 15 Watt |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 10 | 12_1 |
| CUDA | + | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 6−7
−283%
| 23
+283%
|
| 1440p | 8−9
−313%
| 33
+313%
|
| 4K | 4−5
−300%
| 16
+300%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−350%
|
18
+350%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 7−8
−200%
|
21
+200%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−2100%
|
21−24
+2100%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 5−6
−240%
|
17
+240%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−250%
|
14
+250%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−467%
|
17
+467%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
−320%
|
21−24
+320%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−513%
|
45−50
+513%
|
| Hitman 3 | 7−8
−100%
|
14
+100%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 16−18
−153%
|
40−45
+153%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−575%
|
27
+575%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10−11
−150%
|
24−27
+150%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40
−171%
|
95
+171%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 7−8
−400%
|
35
+400%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−2100%
|
21−24
+2100%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 5−6
−260%
|
18
+260%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−150%
|
10
+150%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−467%
|
16−18
+467%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 5−6
−320%
|
21−24
+320%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−513%
|
45−50
+513%
|
| Hitman 3 | 7−8
−100%
|
14
+100%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 16−18
−329%
|
73
+329%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−325%
|
17
+325%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10−11
−140%
|
24
+140%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
−83.3%
|
21−24
+83.3%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40
−129%
|
80
+129%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 7−8
−157%
|
18−20
+157%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 5−6
−200%
|
14−16
+200%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5
−125%
|
9
+125%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4
−467%
|
16−18
+467%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
−238%
|
27
+238%
|
| Hitman 3 | 7−8
−100%
|
14−16
+100%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 16−18
−29.4%
|
22
+29.4%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 10−11
−110%
|
21
+110%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14
−8.3%
|
13
+8.3%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 35−40
−57.1%
|
55−60
+57.1%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 4−5
−350%
|
18
+350%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 3−4
−367%
|
14−16
+367%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 3−4
−267%
|
10−12
+267%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 1−2
−600%
|
7−8
+600%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−300%
|
8−9
+300%
|
| Hitman 3 | 7−8
−57.1%
|
10−12
+57.1%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 6−7
−167%
|
16−18
+167%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−600%
|
7−8
+600%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 10−12
−327%
|
45−50
+327%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 5−6
−160%
|
12−14
+160%
|
4K
High Preset
| Far Cry New Dawn | 1−2
−400%
|
5−6
+400%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 2−3
−100%
|
4−5
+100%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 1−2
−200%
|
3−4
+200%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−300%
|
4−5
+300%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 0−1 | 2−3 |
4K
Epic Preset
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−133%
|
7−8
+133%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 19
+0%
|
19
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 27
+0%
|
27
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 15
+0%
|
15
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 21
+0%
|
21
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Hitman 3 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 13
+0%
|
13
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
This is how 9800M GT SLI and RX Vega 7 compete in popular games:
- RX Vega 7 is 283% faster in 1080p
- RX Vega 7 is 313% faster in 1440p
- RX Vega 7 is 300% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX Vega 7 is 2100% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RX Vega 7 is ahead in 53 tests (76%)
- there's a draw in 17 tests (24%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.98 | 7.40 |
| Recency | 15 July 2008 | 7 January 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 15 Watt |
RX Vega 7 has a 273.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 766.7% lower power consumption.
The Radeon RX Vega 7 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GT SLI in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
