GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs 9800M GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking996not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.67no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG94TU106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 November 2008 (16 years ago)18 June 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64896
Core clock speed530 MHz1410 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1590 MHz
Number of transistors505 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate16.9689.04
Floating-point processing power0.1696 TFLOPS2.849 TFLOPS
Gigaflops254no data
ROPs1632
TMUs3256
Tensor Coresno data112
Ray Tracing Coresno data14

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA+7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2008 18 June 2020
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 90 Watt

9800M GS has 50% lower power consumption.

GTX 1650 TU106, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800M GS and GeForce GTX 1650 TU106. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GS is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS
GeForce 9800M GS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 274 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.