ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500 vs GeForce 9800M GS

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking993not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.67no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameG94R200
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 November 2008 (16 years ago)14 November 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64no data
Core clock speed530 MHz230 MHz
Number of transistors505 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Wattno data
Texture fill rate16.961.840
Floating-point processing power0.1696 TFLOPSno data
Gigaflops254no data
ROPs164
TMUs328

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz190 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s6.08 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA
Multi monitor support+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)8.1
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL2.11.4
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2008 14 November 2001
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 150 nm

9800M GS has an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 130.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800M GS and All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GS is a notebook card while All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS
GeForce 9800M GS
ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500
All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 2 votes

Rate All-In-Wonder Radeon 8500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.