ATI Radeon X1950 XTX vs GeForce 9800 GTX+

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1031not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.03no data
Power efficiency0.63no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameG92BR580+
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date16 January 2009 (15 years ago)17 October 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 $449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed738 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors754 million384 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)141 Watt125 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate47.2310.40
Floating-point processing power0.47 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1616
TMUs6416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mm230 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR4
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1100 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth70.4 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsHDTVDual Link DVI2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.03.0
OpenGL2.12.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 January 2009 17 October 2006
Chip lithography 55 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 141 Watt 125 Watt

9800 GTX+ has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 63.6% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1950 XTX, on the other hand, has 12.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800 GTX+ and Radeon X1950 XTX. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GTX+
GeForce 9800 GTX+
ATI Radeon X1950 XTX
Radeon X1950 XTX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 133 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 8 votes

Rate Radeon X1950 XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.