Quadro FX 5600 vs GeForce 9800 GT

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9800 GT with Quadro FX 5600, including specs and performance data.

9800 GT
2008
1 GB GDDR3, 105 Watt
1.24

FX 5600 outperforms 9800 GT by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10361010
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.040.01
Power efficiency0.690.55
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG92G80
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date21 July 2008 (16 years ago)5 March 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$160 $2,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

9800 GT has 300% better value for money than FX 5600.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores112128
Core clock speed600 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors754 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt171 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate33.6038.40
Floating-point processing power0.336 TFLOPS0.3456 TFLOPS
ROPs1624
TMUs5632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length229 mm254 mm
Height1-slotno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 6-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1536 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s76.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsHDTVDual Link DVI2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9800 GT 1.24
FX 5600 1.36
+9.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9800 GT 478
FX 5600 525
+9.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.24 1.36
Recency 21 July 2008 5 March 2007
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 171 Watt

9800 GT has an age advantage of 1 year, a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 62.9% lower power consumption.

FX 5600, on the other hand, has a 9.7% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce 9800 GT and Quadro FX 5600.

Be aware that GeForce 9800 GT is a desktop card while Quadro FX 5600 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
GeForce 9800 GT
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600
Quadro FX 5600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 1428 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 5 votes

Rate Quadro FX 5600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.