ATI Rage 128 PRO Ultra vs GeForce 9700M GT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1223not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.82no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rage 4 (1998−1999)
GPU code nameG96Rage 4 PRO
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date29 July 2008 (16 years ago)1 August 1999 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32no data
Core clock speed625 MHz130 MHz
Number of transistors314 million8 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattno data
Texture fill rate10.000.26
Floating-point processing power0.0992 TFLOPSno data
Gigaflops148no data
ROPs82
TMUs162

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3SDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz130 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s1.04 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)6.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.2
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 July 2008 1 August 1999
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 250 nm

9700M GT has an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 284.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9700M GT and Rage 128 PRO Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9700M GT is a notebook card while Rage 128 PRO Ultra is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT
GeForce 9700M GT
ATI Rage 128 PRO Ultra
Rage 128 PRO Ultra

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 6 votes

Rate GeForce 9700M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 7 votes

Rate Rage 128 PRO Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.