ATI Radeon HD 4650 vs GeForce 9700M GT

Place in the ranking	1227	1198
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.83	0.90
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code name	G96	RV730
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	29 July 2008 (16 years ago)	10 September 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	32	320
Core clock speed	625 MHz	600 MHz
Number of transistors	314 million	514 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	48 Watt
Texture fill rate	10.00	19.20
Floating-point processing power	0.0992 TFLOPS	0.384 TFLOPS
Gigaflops	148	no data
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	16	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	MXM-II	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	no data	193 mm
Width	no data	1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	256 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	700 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	22.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	4.0	4.1
OpenGL	3.3	3.3
OpenCL	1.1	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9700M GT 0.54

ATI HD 4650 0.63
+16.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9700M GT 208

ATI HD 4650 242
+16.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Fortnite	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
World of Tanks	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
World of Tanks	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Valorant	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
Valorant	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.54	0.63
Recency	29 July 2008	10 September 2008
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	256 MB
Chip lithography	65 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	48 Watt

9700M GT has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 6.7% lower power consumption.

ATI HD 4650, on the other hand, has a 16.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon HD 4650 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9700M GT in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9700M GT is a notebook card while Radeon HD 4650 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.