Edge 3D 2200XL vs GeForce 9650M GT

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)no data
GPU code nameG96CNV1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date19 August 2008 (16 years ago)30 September 1995 (29 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32no data
Core clock speed550 MHz60 MHz
Number of transistors314 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm500 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Wattno data
Texture fill rate8.8000.06
Floating-point processing power0.0848 TFLOPSno data
ROPs81
TMUs161

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCI
Lengthno data191 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DRAM
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz60 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s480 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA
Maximum VGA resolution1920x1200no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)1.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 August 2008 30 September 1995
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 500 nm

9650M GT has an age advantage of 12 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 809.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9650M GT and Edge 3D 2200XL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9650M GT is a notebook card while Edge 3D 2200XL is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GT
GeForce 9650M GT
NVIDIA Edge 3D 2200XL
Edge 3D 2200XL

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 7 votes

Rate GeForce 9650M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Edge 3D 2200XL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.