GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 vs 9600 GT

Place in the ranking	1034	720
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.04	0.19
Power efficiency	0.91	5.01
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code name	G94	GK208
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	21 February 2008 (16 years ago)	29 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$179	$89

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GT 640 Rev. 2 has 375% better value for money than 9600 GT.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	64	384
Core clock speed	650 MHz	1046 MHz
Number of transistors	505 million	915 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	96 Watt	49 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	105 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	20.80	33.47
Floating-point processing power	0.208 TFLOPS	0.8033 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	8
TMUs	32	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	16x PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x8
Length	229 mm	145 mm
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	1 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	1252 MHz
Memory bandwidth	57.6 GB/s	40.06 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	HDTVTwo Dual Link DVI	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	-	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.0	5.1
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA	+	3.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.25	3.55
Recency	21 February 2008	29 May 2013
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	1 GB
Chip lithography	65 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	96 Watt	49 Watt

GT 640 Rev. 2 has a 184% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 95.9% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9600 GT in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.