Radeon RX Vega 7 vs GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated529
Place by popularitynot in top-10012
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameG94Vega Raven Ridge
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date22 December 2008 (15 years ago)7 January 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64448
Core clock speed600 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1800 MHz
Number of transistors505 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate19.20no data
Floating-point performance0.192 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length229 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed532 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth17.02 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVIno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12_1
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 December 2008 7 January 2020
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 15 Watt

RX Vega 7 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition and Radeon RX Vega 7. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition is a desktop card while Radeon RX Vega 7 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition
GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
Radeon RX Vega 7

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 5 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GT Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 4857 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.