GeForce 8800 GTS 640 vs 9600 GSO

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1135not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.09no data
Power efficiency0.71no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG92G80
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date28 April 2008 (16 years ago)8 November 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$49.99 $449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9696
Core clock speed550 MHz513 MHz
Number of transistors754 million681 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt143 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate26.4024.62
Floating-point processing power0.264 TFLOPS0.2281 TFLOPS
ROPs1220
TMUs4824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length229 mm267 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin
SLI options2-way-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount384 MB640 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz792 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s63.36 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVIHDTV2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA++

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 April 2008 8 November 2006
Maximum RAM amount 384 MB 640 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 143 Watt

9600 GSO has an age advantage of 1 year, a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 36.2% lower power consumption.

8800 GTS 640, on the other hand, has a 66.7% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9600 GSO and GeForce 8800 GTS 640. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
GeForce 9600 GSO
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 640
GeForce 8800 GTS 640

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 57 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GSO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 45 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTS 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.