GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile vs 9600 GSO 512

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9600 GSO 512 with GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

9600 GSO 512
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 90 Watt
0.74

RTX 3070 Mobile outperforms 9600 GSO 512 by a whopping 4241% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1146135
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.6522.23
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG94GA104
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date23 October 2008 (16 years ago)12 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores485120
Core clock speed650 MHz1110 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1560 MHz
Number of transistors505 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt125 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate15.60249.6
Floating-point processing power0.156 TFLOPS15.97 TFLOPS
ROPs1680
TMUs24160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data
SLI options2-way-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIHDTVNo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA+8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9600 GSO 512 0.74
RTX 3070 Mobile 32.12
+4241%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9600 GSO 512 329
RTX 3070 Mobile 14364
+4266%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−5700%
116
+5700%
1440p1−2
−7400%
75
+7400%
4K1−2
−4500%
46
+4500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 187
+0%
187
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 241
+0%
241
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 119
+0%
119
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 144
+0%
144
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 230
+0%
230
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 107
+0%
107
+0%
Far Cry 5 119
+0%
119
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 189
+0%
189
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 144
+0%
144
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 89
+0%
89
+0%
Battlefield 5 134
+0%
134
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 172
+0%
172
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 88
+0%
88
+0%
Dota 2 130
+0%
130
+0%
Far Cry 5 114
+0%
114
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 188
+0%
188
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 132
+0%
132
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 125
+0%
125
+0%
Metro Exodus 97
+0%
97
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170
+0%
170
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 126
+0%
126
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
+0%
74
+0%
Dota 2 120
+0%
120
+0%
Far Cry 5 107
+0%
107
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 167
+0%
167
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 94
+0%
94
+0%
Valorant 183
+0%
183
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 106
+0%
106
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 83
+0%
83
+0%
Metro Exodus 59
+0%
59
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 254
+0%
254
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 102
+0%
102
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 47
+0%
47
+0%
Far Cry 5 91
+0%
91
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140
+0%
140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 32
+0%
32
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 83
+0%
83
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
+0%
64
+0%
Valorant 238
+0%
238
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 63
+0%
63
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+0%
22
+0%
Dota 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Far Cry 5 51
+0%
51
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 93
+0%
93
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how 9600 GSO 512 and RTX 3070 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Mobile is 5700% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 Mobile is 7400% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 Mobile is 4500% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.74 32.12
Recency 23 October 2008 12 January 2021
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 125 Watt

9600 GSO 512 has 38.9% lower power consumption.

RTX 3070 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 4240.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 712.5% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9600 GSO 512 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9600 GSO 512 is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO 512
GeForce 9600 GSO 512
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 61 vote

Rate GeForce 9600 GSO 512 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 2002 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9600 GSO 512 or GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.