Radeon 660M vs GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot rated329
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 2 (2020−2023)
GPU code nameG96CRDNA 2 Rembrandt
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date29 July 2008 (16 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32384
Core clock speed500 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1900 MHz
Number of transistors314 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate8.00045.60
Floating-point performance0.08 gflops1.459 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2no data
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth16 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 July 2008 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 55 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 45 Watt

9500 GS Rev. 2 has 12.5% lower power consumption.

Radeon 660M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 816.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2 and Radeon 660M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2 is a desktop card while Radeon 660M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2
GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2
AMD Radeon 660M
Radeon 660M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 279 votes

Rate Radeon 660M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.