Radeon R7 350 vs GeForce 940MX

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 940MX with Radeon R7 350, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 940MX
2016
4 GB DDR3, GDDR5, 23 Watt
3.94

R7 350 outperforms 940MX by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking698603
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.746.97
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameGM107Cape Verde
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date28 June 2016 (8 years ago)6 July 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512512
Core clock speed795 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed861 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate27.5525.60
Floating-point processing power0.8817 TFLOPS0.8192 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs3232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s72 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%
4K10
−40%
14−16
+40%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 11
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Battlefield 5 14
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Far Cry 5 11
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Forza Horizon 4 71
−40.8%
100−105
+40.8%
Hitman 3 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 19
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−31%
55−60
+31%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Battlefield 5 10
−40%
14−16
+40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Far Cry 5 11
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Forza Horizon 4 41
−34.1%
55−60
+34.1%
Hitman 3 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−29.6%
35−40
+29.6%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−31%
55−60
+31%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5
−40%
7−8
+40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Far Cry 5 8
−25%
10−11
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 12
−33.3%
16−18
+33.3%
Hitman 3 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 11
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−40%
21−24
+40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−31%
55−60
+31%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−40%
14−16
+40%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Hitman 3 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27
−25%
30−33
+25%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−25%
10−11
+25%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Hitman 3 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%

This is how GeForce 940MX and R7 350 compete in popular games:

  • R7 350 is 41% faster in 1080p
  • R7 350 is 40% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.94 5.59
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 55 Watt

GeForce 940MX has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 139.1% lower power consumption.

R7 350, on the other hand, has a 41.9% higher aggregate performance score.

The Radeon R7 350 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 940MX in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 940MX is a notebook card while Radeon R7 350 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 940MX
GeForce 940MX
AMD Radeon R7 350
Radeon R7 350

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 2216 votes

Rate GeForce 940MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 485 votes

Rate Radeon R7 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.