ATI Radeon SDR PCI vs GeForce 940A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking784not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.06no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameGM108Rage 6
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2015 (9 years ago)1 June 2000 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed1029 MHz166 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data30 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate17.981
Floating-point processing power0.8632 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs166

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCI
Lengthno data165 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3SDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB32 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s2.656 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)7.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2015 1 June 2000
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 23 Watt

GeForce 940A has an age advantage of 14 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI SDR PCI, on the other hand, has 43.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 940A and Radeon SDR PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 940A is a notebook card while Radeon SDR PCI is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 940A
GeForce 940A
ATI Radeon SDR PCI
Radeon SDR PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3 votes

Rate GeForce 940A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon SDR PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.