ATI Radeon HD 5870 Eyefinity 6 vs GeForce 9400M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1355not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.49no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameC79Cypress
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 October 2008 (16 years ago)11 March 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$479

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161600
Core clock speed580 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors314 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt228 Watt
Texture fill rate4.64068.00
Floating-point processing power0.0448 TFLOPS2.72 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data279 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1200 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data153.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs6x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 October 2008 11 March 2010
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 228 Watt

GeForce 9400M has 1800% lower power consumption.

ATI HD 5870 Eyefinity 6, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M and Radeon HD 5870 Eyefinity 6. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M is a notebook card while Radeon HD 5870 Eyefinity 6 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400M
GeForce 9400M
ATI Radeon HD 5870 Eyefinity 6
Radeon HD 5870 Eyefinity 6

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 44 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 5 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5870 Eyefinity 6 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.