Radeon Pro VII vs GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated158
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data15.80
Power efficiencyno data9.22
Architectureno dataGCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameno dataVega 20
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 June 2008 (16 years ago)13 May 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores243840
Core clock speedno data1400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistorsno data13,230 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data408.0
Floating-point processing powerno data13.06 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data305 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1024 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 13 May 2020
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm

Pro VII has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost and Radeon Pro VII. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost is a notebook card while Radeon Pro VII is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost
GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost
AMD Radeon Pro VII
Radeon Pro VII

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 14 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1548 votes

Rate Radeon Pro VII on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.