Tesla M1060 vs GeForce 9400M G

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1407not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.97no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameC79GT200B
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 October 2008 (16 years ago)1 June 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16240
Core clock speed450 MHz610 MHz
Number of transistors314 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt188 Watt
Texture fill rate3.60048.80
Floating-point processing power0.0352 TFLOPS0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared512 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data102.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 October 2008 1 June 2008
Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 188 Watt

9400M G has an age advantage of 4 months, and 1466.7% lower power consumption.

Tesla M1060, on the other hand, has a 18.2% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M G and Tesla M1060. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M G is a notebook card while Tesla M1060 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400M G
GeForce 9400M G
NVIDIA Tesla M1060
Tesla M1060

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 6 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Tesla M1060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.