UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) vs GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)

Place in the ranking	1324	1014
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.78	9.57
Architecture	no data	Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code name	MCP79MX	Gen. 11
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	14 October 2008 (16 years ago)	11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	16	24
Core clock speed	450 MHz	350 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	800 MHz
Number of transistors	282 Million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12 Watt	4.8 - 10 Watt

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Shared memory

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX

10.0

12_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9400M (G) / ION (LE) 0.31

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 1.39
+348%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

9400M (G) / ION (LE) 607

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) 3411
+462%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

1−2

−700%

8
+700%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −16.7%	7 +16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −33.3%	8 +33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 +0%	6 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 −150%	14−16 +150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
World of Tanks	12−14 −38.5%	18 +38.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −83.3%	10−12 +83.3%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 −150%	14−16 +150%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

2−3

−300%

8−9
+300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	0−1	1−2
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Valorant	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Dota 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	1−2
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Dota 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Valorant	0−1	1−2

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	6 +0%	6 +0%
Fortnite	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	3 +0%	3 +0%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	11 +0%	11 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
World of Tanks	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 5

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

4K
High Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

This is how 9400M (G) / ION (LE) and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) is 700% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) is 300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) is ahead in 25 tests (60%)
there's a draw in 17 tests (40%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.31	1.39
Recency	14 October 2008	11 January 2021
Chip lithography	65 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12 Watt	4 Watt

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) has a 348.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 550% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.