Tesla V100 SMX2 vs GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1317not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.80no data
Architectureno dataVolta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameMCP79MXGV100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date14 October 2008 (16 years ago)21 June 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores165120
Core clock speed450 MHz1370 MHz
Number of transistors282 Million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data438.4
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data320

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data4096 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1758 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data900.1 GB/s
Shared memory+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.012.0
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
CUDA-7.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 October 2008 21 June 2017
Chip lithography 65 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 250 Watt

9400M (G) / ION (LE) has 1983.3% lower power consumption.

Tesla V100 SMX2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) and Tesla V100 SMX2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) is a notebook card while Tesla V100 SMX2 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SMX2
Tesla V100 SMX2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 37 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 5 votes

Rate Tesla V100 SMX2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.