P102-100 vs GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) with P102-100, including specs and performance data.

9400M (G) / ION (LE)
2008
12 Watt
0.31

P102-100 outperforms 9400M (G) / ION (LE) by a whopping 2361% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1317524
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.25
Power efficiency1.802.13
Architectureno dataPascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameMCP79MXGP102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date14 October 2008 (16 years ago)12 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores163200
Core clock speed450 MHz1582 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1683 MHz
Number of transistors282 Million11,800 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data336.6
Floating-point processing powerno data10.77 TFLOPS
ROPsno data80
TMUsno data200

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x4
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5X
Maximum RAM amountno data5 GB
Memory bus widthno data320 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1376 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data440.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2275%
95−100
+2275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2275%
190−200
+2275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−2275%
95−100
+2275%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−2221%
650−700
+2221%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2275%
95−100
+2275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2275%
190−200
+2275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−2275%
95−100
+2275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−2344%
220−230
+2344%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−2221%
650−700
+2221%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2275%
95−100
+2275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2275%
190−200
+2275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−2275%
95−100
+2275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−2344%
220−230
+2344%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−2221%
650−700
+2221%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7
−2233%
140−150
+2233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2150%
45−50
+2150%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.31 7.63
Recency 14 October 2008 12 February 2018
Chip lithography 65 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 250 Watt

9400M (G) / ION (LE) has 1983.3% lower power consumption.

P102-100, on the other hand, has a 2361.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.

The P102-100 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) is a notebook card while P102-100 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
NVIDIA P102-100
P102-100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 37 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 31 vote

Rate P102-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.