Tesla K80m vs GeForce 9400

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameC79GK210
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date17 April 2007 (17 years ago)17 November 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162x 2496
Core clock speed450 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speedno data824 MHz
Number of transistors314 million7,100 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate3.6002x 182.2 billion/sec
Floating-point processing power0.0352 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42x 48
TMUs82x 208

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2x 12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared2x 384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared5012 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2x 240.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12.0 (11_1)
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 April 2007 17 November 2014
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 300 Watt

GeForce 9400 has 650% lower power consumption.

Tesla K80m, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400 and Tesla K80m. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400 is a desktop card while Tesla K80m is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400
GeForce 9400
NVIDIA Tesla K80m
Tesla K80m

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 15 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 10 votes

Rate Tesla K80m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.