Tesla C2070 vs GeForce 9400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9400 with Tesla C2070, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 9400
2007
40 Watt
0.25

Tesla C2070 outperforms 9400 by a whopping 3136% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1354512
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.442.37
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameC79GF100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date17 April 2007 (17 years ago)25 July 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16448
Core clock speed450 MHz574 MHz
Number of transistors314 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt238 Watt
Texture fill rate3.60032.14
Floating-point processing power0.0352 TFLOPS1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs856

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data248 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared747 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data143.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 9400 0.25
Tesla C2070 8.09
+3136%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 9400 98
Tesla C2070 3120
+3084%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.25 8.09
Recency 17 April 2007 25 July 2011
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 238 Watt

GeForce 9400 has 495% lower power consumption.

Tesla C2070, on the other hand, has a 3136% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Tesla C2070 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9400 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9400 is a desktop card while Tesla C2070 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400
GeForce 9400
NVIDIA Tesla C2070
Tesla C2070

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 15 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Tesla C2070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.