GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs 9400 GT Rev. 3

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated384
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data12.21
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGT218GP107
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date13 June 2012 (12 years ago)21 May 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16768
Core clock speed589 MHz1392 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1518 MHz
Number of transistors260 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate4.71272.86
Floating-point processing power0.04486 TFLOPS2.332 TFLOPS
ROPs424
TMUs848

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length168 mm145 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB3 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s84.1 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.26.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 June 2012 21 May 2018
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 3 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 75 Watt

9400 GT Rev. 3 has 50% lower power consumption.

GTX 1050 3 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 and GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 133 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 339 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.