Arc A530M vs GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated332
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Xe HPG (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGT218Alchemist
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date13 June 2012 (12 years ago)31 July 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1612
Core clock speed589 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors260 million11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt65 Watt (65 - 95 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate4.712124.8
Floating-point processing power0.04486 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 June 2012 31 July 2023
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 65 Watt

9400 GT Rev. 3 has 30% lower power consumption.

Arc A530M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 and Arc A530M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 is a desktop card while Arc A530M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
Intel Arc A530M
Arc A530M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 133 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 172 votes

Rate Arc A530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.