GeForce GT 640 vs 930A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 930A with GeForce GT 640, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 930A
2015
2 GB DDR3, 33 Watt
3.28
+7.5%

930A outperforms GT 640 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking738765
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.20
Power efficiency6.933.27
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGM108GK107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2015 (9 years ago)5 June 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384384
Core clock speed928 MHz902 MHz
Boost clock speed941 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate22.5828.86
Floating-point processing power0.7227 TFLOPS0.6927 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs2432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz891 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s28.51 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA5.03.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 930A 3.28
+7.5%
GT 640 3.05

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 930A 1267
+7.8%
GT 640 1175

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GeForce 930A 5317
+42.3%
GT 640 3736

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.28 3.05
Recency 13 March 2015 5 June 2012
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 65 Watt

GeForce 930A has a 7.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 97% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce 930A and GeForce GT 640.

Be aware that GeForce 930A is a notebook card while GeForce GT 640 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 930A
GeForce 930A
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
GeForce GT 640

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.9 18 votes

Rate GeForce 930A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 1542 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.