GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile vs 9300M GS

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9300M GS and GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

9300M GS
2008
256 MB GDDR3, 13 Watt
0.26

RTX 3060 Mobile outperforms 9300M GS by a whopping 12412% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1353165
Place by popularitynot in top-10090
Power efficiency1.3928.36
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG98GA106
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date4 June 2008 (16 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores83840
Core clock speed550 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1425 MHz
Number of transistors210 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate4.400171.0
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPS10.94 TFLOPS
Gigaflops34no data
ROPs448
TMUs8120
Tensor Coresno data120
Ray Tracing Coresno data30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceMXM-IPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9300M GS 0.26
RTX 3060 Mobile 32.53
+12412%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9300M GS 100
RTX 3060 Mobile 12550
+12450%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

9300M GS 267
RTX 3060 Mobile 57333
+21373%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−198
1440p0−166
4K-0−142

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−5050%
103
+5050%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3200%
65−70
+3200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4200%
86
+4200%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2550%
106
+2550%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1675%
140−150
+1675%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−2775%
110−120
+2775%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−321%
110−120
+321%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3200%
65−70
+3200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3350%
69
+3350%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2600%
108
+2600%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2263%
189
+2263%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−3850%
158
+3850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−656%
65−70
+656%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−464%
158
+464%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−2233%
70−75
+2233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3200%
65−70
+3200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3000%
62
+3000%
Hitman 3 4−5
−2300%
96
+2300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1400%
120
+1400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−3400%
140
+3400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−767%
78
+767%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−64.3%
46
+64.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 39
Hitman 3 6−7
−967%
64
+967%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−4150%
85
+4150%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−3900%
80
+3900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2000%
21−24
+2000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 11

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2100%
44
+2100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 76
+0%
76
+0%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Metro Exodus 164
+0%
164
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 64
+0%
64
+0%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Metro Exodus 129
+0%
129
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 102
+0%
102
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 56
+0%
56
+0%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 96
+0%
96
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 48
+0%
48
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 85
+0%
85
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 101
+0%
101
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 116
+0%
116
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hitman 3 41
+0%
41
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 60
+0%
60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55
+0%
55
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+0%
15
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60
+0%
60
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 19
+0%
19
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 3060 Mobile is 5050% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3060 Mobile is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
  • there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.26 32.53
Recency 4 June 2008 12 January 2021
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 80 Watt

9300M GS has 515.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 3060 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 12411.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 712.5% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9300M GS in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9300M GS
GeForce 9300M GS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 161 vote

Rate GeForce 9300M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 4960 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.