Tesla X2070 vs GeForce 9200M GS

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameG98GF110
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 June 2008 (16 years ago)25 July 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8512
Core clock speed550 MHz651 MHz
Number of transistors210 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate4.40041.66
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPS1.332 TFLOPS
Gigaflops31no data
ROPs448
TMUs864

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno dataMXM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz924 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s177.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 225 Watt

9200M GS has 1630.8% lower power consumption.

Tesla X2070, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9200M GS and Tesla X2070. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9200M GS is a notebook card while Tesla X2070 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
GeForce 9200M GS
NVIDIA Tesla X2070
Tesla X2070

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 28 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Tesla X2070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.