GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile vs 9200M GS

Place in the ranking	1301	217
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.80	28.89
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	G98	GN20-P0-R 6 GB
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	3 June 2008 (16 years ago)	6 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	8	2560
Core clock speed	550 MHz	1237 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1492 MHz
Number of transistors	210 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	13 Watt	60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	4.400	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.0224 TFLOPS	no data
Gigaflops	31	no data
ROPs	4	no data
TMUs	8	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	6 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	700 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	11.2 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12_2
Shader Model	4.0	no data
OpenGL	3.3	no data
OpenCL	1.1	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-
CUDA	+	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	0−1	69
1440p	-0−1	37

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −488%	45−50 +488%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −3950%	81 +3950%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −488%	45−50 +488%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1500%	32 +1500%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −2000%	105 +2000%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −1275%	55−60 +1275%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −400%	40 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1050%	23 +1050%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1517%	97 +1517%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −1620%	86 +1620%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −2157%	150−160 +2157%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −1275%	55−60 +1275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −1540%	80−85 +1540%
World of Tanks	12−14 −1892%	250−260 +1892%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −488%	45−50 +488%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −850%	19 +850%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1183%	75−80 +1183%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −1420%	76 +1420%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −2157%	150−160 +2157%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

2−3

−8650%

170−180
+8650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −133%	21−24 +133%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −1750%	70−75 +1750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −1750%	37 +1750%
Valorant	5−6 −1260%	65−70 +1260%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −193%	40−45 +193%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −193%	40−45 +193%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	1−2 −7600%	75−80 +7600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −193%	40−45 +193%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	24−27
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Dota 2	14−16 −193%	40−45 +193%
Valorant	1−2 −3200%	30−35 +3200%

Full HD
Low Preset

Elden Ring

80−85

+0%

80−85

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Valorant	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Dota 2	61 +0%	61 +0%
Elden Ring	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Fortnite	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	91 +0%	91 +0%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Valorant	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Dota 2	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Valorant	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	40 +0%	40 +0%
Elden Ring	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	40 +0%	40 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
World of Tanks	160−170 +0%	160−170 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	57 +0%	57 +0%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Elden Ring	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Fortnite	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 8650% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is ahead in 32 tests (52%)
there's a draw in 30 tests (48%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.34	25.18
Recency	3 June 2008	6 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	6 GB
Chip lithography	65 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	13 Watt	60 Watt

9200M GS has 361.5% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, on the other hand, has a 7305.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 712.5% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9200M GS in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.