STG vs GeForce 910M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking962not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.27no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)no data
GPU code nameGK208BNV1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2015 (9 years ago)30 September 1995 (29 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed641 MHz75 MHz
Number of transistors915 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm500 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt2 Watt
Texture fill rate20.510.08
Floating-point processing power0.4923 TFLOPSno data
ROPs81
TMUs321

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCI
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3FPM
Maximum RAM amountDDR3 MB1 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz50 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s400.0 MB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA, 1x DB13W3

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)1.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.5N/A
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2015 30 September 1995
Chip lithography 28 nm 500 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 2 Watt

GeForce 910M has an age advantage of 19 years, and a 1685.7% more advanced lithography process.

STG, on the other hand, has 1550% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 910M and STG. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 910M is a notebook card while STG is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 910M
GeForce 910M
NVIDIA STG
STG

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 60 votes

Rate GeForce 910M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.8 5 votes

Rate STG on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.