GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 vs 910M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking967not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.30no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGK208BGP108
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2015 (9 years ago)12 March 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$79

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384384
Core clock speed641 MHz1152 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1379 MHz
Number of transistors915 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate20.5133.10
Floating-point processing power0.4923 TFLOPS1.059 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs3224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x4
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR4
Maximum RAM amountDDR3 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz1050 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s16.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2015 12 March 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 20 Watt

GT 1030 DDR4 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 65% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 910M and GeForce GT 1030 DDR4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 910M is a notebook card while GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 910M
GeForce 910M
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
GeForce GT 1030 DDR4

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 60 votes

Rate GeForce 910M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 978 votes

Rate GeForce GT 1030 DDR4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.