Tesla M2050 vs GeForce 9100
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | Fermi (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | C78 | GF100 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 17 April 2007 (17 years ago) | 25 July 2011 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $2,699 |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 16 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 210 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 4.000 | 32.20 |
| Floating-point performance | no data | 1,030.4 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCI | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 248 mm |
| Width | IGP | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 3 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 3092 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 148.4 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 April 2007 | 25 July 2011 |
| Chip lithography | 80 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 225 Watt |
GeForce 9100 has 462.5% lower power consumption.
Tesla M2050, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce 9100 and Tesla M2050. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce 9100 is a desktop card while Tesla M2050 is a workstation one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
