GeForce FX 5800 vs 8800M GTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1051not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.28no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameG92NV30
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 November 2007 (17 years ago)6 March 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed500 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors754 million125 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt44 Watt
Texture fill rate24.003.200
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs488

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-HEAGP 8x
Lengthno data213 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0a
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2007 6 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 44 Watt

8800M GTX has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

FX 5800, on the other hand, has 47.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800M GTX and GeForce FX 5800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800M GTX is a notebook card while GeForce FX 5800 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
GeForce 8800M GTX
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5800
GeForce FX 5800

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 2 votes

Rate GeForce 8800M GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 22 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.