GeForce 9800M GS vs 8800M GTX

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8800M GTX and GeForce 9800M GS, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

8800M GTX
2007
512 MB GDDR3, 65 Watt
1.20

9800M GS outperforms 8800M GTX by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1057999
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.271.65
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG92G94
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 November 2007 (17 years ago)1 November 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9664
Core clock speed500 MHz530 MHz
Number of transistors754 million505 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate24.0016.96
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS0.1696 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data254
ROPs1616
TMUs4832

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfaceMXM-HEPCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s51.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Multi monitor supportno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

8800M GTX 1.20
9800M GS 1.44
+20%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8800M GTX 462
9800M GS 554
+19.9%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

8800M GTX 3422
+5.5%
9800M GS 3245

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Elden Ring 0−1 1−2

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Dota 2 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Elden Ring 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Fortnite 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−15.4%
14−16
+15.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
World of Tanks 24−27
−15.4%
30−33
+15.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Dota 2 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−10%
10−12
+10%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−15.4%
14−16
+15.4%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
World of Tanks 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Valorant 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
−6.7%
16−18
+6.7%
Far Cry 5 0−1 1−2
Valorant 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring 0−1 0−1

4K
High Preset

Elden Ring 0−1 0−1

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the 9800M GS is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • 9800M GS is ahead in 28 tests (68%)
  • there's a draw in 13 tests (32%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.20 1.44
Recency 1 November 2007 1 November 2008
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 60 Watt

9800M GS has a 20% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 8.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 9800M GS is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800M GTX in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
GeForce 8800M GTX
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GS
GeForce 9800M GS

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 2 votes

Rate GeForce 8800M GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.